Teach Effectively pal Dan Willingham has another treatment of the learning-styles myth at the Washington Post. In a guest entry for Valerie Strauss’ “The Answer Sheet,” Professor Willingham mentions the recent scientific review of research that debunked the myth (yet again) and provides responses to some of the pro-myth arguments that he’s encountered. Here’s a link to “Willingham: No evidence exists for learning style theories.”
Sphere: Related ContentGoogle Ads
Blogroll
- B. Mod.
- D-Ed Reckoning
- EBD Blog
- Eduflack
- From the Trenches…
- Instructional Solutions
- Instructivist
- Joanne Jacobs
- Kitchen Table Math
- Learning Disabilities Blog
- Liz Ditz’s blog
- Mentor Matters
- No Limits to Learning
- On Special Ed
- Professor Plum
- Special Ed Law Blog
- Special Ed Today
- Special Education Teacher in DC
- SpedPro
- SQE blog
- Teachers at Risk
- The Life that Chose me
- Willingham's Education Science Blog
- Your Mama’s Mad Tedious…
Web resources
- All4Ed
- Best Evidence
- BIBR
- Cambridge Center
- Campbell Collaboration
- CDL
- CELL
- Celleration
- Child Trends
- Children of the Code
- Coalition for Evidence-Based Practice
- CRE
- CSRQ
- Dan Willingham's site
- ECF
- Education News
- EPPI
- Illinois Loop
- Intervention Central
- LD Advocates
- Legacy of Learning
- NIFDI
- PT Hub-Wiki
- Society for Quality Education
- SPW
- SREE
- TeachingLD.org
- TIEE
- WhatWorks
- Where’s the Math
- Wing Institute
- Ziggy’s site
Recent Comments

+1 Teach Effectively!
Tags
achievement
Administration
arithmetic
bogus bowls
bologna
brain
cartoons
CBM
comments
conferences
Direct Instruction
early childhood
effectiveness
efficacy
ell
evidence
evidence-based
evidence-based education
humor
learning styles
literacy
logic
math
mathematics
News
Policy
pre-k
preschool
professional development
public policy
Reading
Reading First
reason
reforms
Research
response to intervention
rti
Secondary
special education
teachers
teaching
testing
US
WMD
wwc
Would this also extend to saying that things like “auditory processing disorders” are also bunk?
I enjoy reading Professor Willingham’s research, including “Why Students Don’t Like School”. However, I am a bit confused when Professor Willingham says that IQ is “malleable”, or capable of being changed.
If that is true, then is it also true that mental retardation can be eradicated, cured, or otherwise remediated?
If IQ is indeed malleable, then perhaps the goal of 100% of all students scoring proficient is not such bad federal education policy afterall.