Monthly Archive for February, 2009

Effective teaching practices

For a long time, we have known a lot about effective practices in teaching. Of course, there is debate about whether the specifics are exactly correct, whether some studies have been discredited, or whether the paradigm fits people’s biases. Despite these debates, some general guidelines about effective teaching can be distilled from educational research. Here is one general description of effective teaching practices. I consider it a helpful guide to explicit, systematic instruction. In the parlance I use, this set of features describes “direct instruction” (note the lower-case letters):

In general, researchers have found that when effective teachers teach well-structured subjects, they:

Sphere: Related Content

Lasting effects of phonics instruction

Professor G. Brian Thompson and colleagues reported that early reading instruction has lasting effects on how people as adults read pseudowords. Although this finding is primarily informational, I note it here because it illustrates an important point about long-term effects of instruction: The differences in instructional methods may seem trivial, but they continue to exist many years after the fact.

Thompson, G. B., Connelly, Vincent, Fletcher-Flinn, C. M. & Hodson, S. J. (2009). The nature of skilled adult reading varies with type of instruction in childhood. Memory & Cognition, 37, 223-234.

Does the type of reading instruction experienced during the initial years at school have any continuing effect on the ways in which adults read words? The question has arisen in current discussions about computational models of mature word-reading processes. We tested predicted continuing effects by comparing matched samples of skilled adult readers of English who had received explicit phonics instruction in childhood and those who had not. In responding to nonwords that can receive alternative legitimate pronunciations, those adults having childhood phonics instruction used more regular grapheme-phoneme correspondences that were context free and used fewer vocabulary-based contextually dependent correspondences than did adults who had no phonics instruction. These differences in regularization of naming responses also extended to some low-frequency words. This apparent cognitive footprint of childhood phonics instruction is a phenomenon requiring consideration when researchers attempt to model adult word reading and when they select participants to test the models.

Sphere: Related Content

IRIS joins webinar effort

The IRIS Center will contribute expertise about curriculum-based assessment to a pending webinar about response-to-instruction.

WestEd’s SchoolsMovingUp website will feature another free webinar, “Response to Intervention: Online Professional Development Modules and Resources for Classroom Assessment,” on Wednesday, February 18, from 10:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Pacific Time (1:30 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time).

This interactive webinar will highlight free online professional development modules and resources provided by the IRIS (IDEA ’04 and Research for Inclusive Settings) Center for Training Enhancements to support the validated practice of monitoring students’ progress and curriculum-based assessment, a cornerstone of Response to Intervention (RtI). The presenters – Silvia DeRuvo, Senior Program Associate at the California Comprehensive Center at WestEd; Kimberly Skow, Project Coordinator of The IRIS Center; and Debbie DeBerry, practicing School Psychologist in Hardeman County, Tennessee – will discuss how these online professional development resources have been used to assist teachers in the essential practice of progress monitoring. This webinar is cosponsored by SchoolsMovingUp, the IRIS Center, and the California Comprehensive Center at WestEd.

Jump to the IRIS Center for more.

Sphere: Related Content

NIFDI fellowships

Just in time for grad students who are planning studies involving Direct Instruction: An opportunity to obtain support from the National Institute for Direct Instruction.

Dear Colleagues:

Attached is an announcement by the National Institute for Direct Instruction (NIFDI) regarding a fellowship opportunity for graduate students and post-graduate scholars. The fellowship is designed to promote the development of emerging scholars in the field of education at the same time that it supports high-quality research on Direct Instruction (DI). Full eligibility information and on-line applications are available on NIFDI’s website at http://www.nifdi.org

Please forward this announcement to other colleagues. Feel free to contact us via our toll-free number, 1 877 485-1973, or research _at_ nifdi _dot_ org if you have any questions.

Regards,

Jean Stockard, Ph.D.
Director of Research
National Institute for Direct Instruction
Toll Fee 877-485-1973

Sphere: Related Content

Zig site morphs

Zig Engelmann, principle author of a sweet suite of instructional materials that cover the range from beginning language skills to core concepts in physical sciences, has revised his Web site, Zig Site. If you’ve ever heard of “Direct Instruction” (sometimes said, “Big DI”), you’ve heard of Zig’s work. The new site has somethings new and somethings old. Rather than précis the changes, here’s how Zig describes it:

Starting in 2009, Zigsite is going to have an emphasis on training through videos. The first will be a series of 13 video sessions on teaching English pronunciation to non-English speakers. It will be followed by a series of training videos on teaching our new program, Direct Instruction Spoken English.

The longer printed works on Zigsite include, Rubric for Identifying Authentic DI Programs, Low Performers’ Manual, and the log of the first formal study I did in education—Comparative Preschool Study: High and Low SES Preschoolers Learning Advanced Cognitive Skills. These are constructive. Most of the other works are constructive only in the sense that they help clarify why education has gone basically nowhere in the past 40 years. Only now are educators starting to “invent” some of the stuff we used back in the 60s.

Continue reading ‘Zig site morphs’

Sphere: Related Content

Reading First advocates

I noticed with interest that there is a Web site entitled “The National Association for Reading First.” What’s it about? Here’s the text from the front page:

HomeMembershipState DataUpcoming EventsUSDOEShare Your VoiceContact UsAbout Us

Our Purpose

To promote the implementation of effective, scientifically-based K-3 reading instructional models related to addressing the literacy crisis in our nation

To promote and disseminate applied scientific research-to-practice information to guide effective reading instructional practices and interventions for all students

To foster a mutually informative relationship between scientific researchers and members of the professional educational community

Our Vision

All educational professionals will provide research-based instruction ensuring literacy success for all students.

Our Mission

Bridge scientific research and classroom practice to increase literacy achievement for all students.

Link to the Web site and explore on your own.

Reminder: I am a member of the Reading First Advisory Committee. I am not, however, speaking for the committee, my fellow panelists, nor the US Department of Education here. This entry simply reports the existence of the identified Web site so that others may know about it and make their own evaluations of it.

Sphere: Related Content

Tech not

Todd Oppenheimer, who wrote The Flickering Mind: Saving Education from the False Promise of Technology, published an op-ed piece in the San Francisco (CA, US) Chronicle recommending that US President Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan avoid plans to invest heavily in computer technology for US schools. In “Technology not the panacea for education,” Mr. Oppenheimer argues that promoting technology will not improve US competitiveness.

Rather than promote technology, Mr. Oppenheimer recommends—gasp!—preparing students to read, write, and compute!

Continue reading ‘Tech not’

Sphere: Related Content

Zigler on Title I

Over on Ed Week Professor Edward Zigler offered a recommendation about contemporary educational policy in the US. He argued that Title I should be modified so that it reflects the Head Start Transition program of the ’90s and the Chicago Child-Parent Centers. He (rightly, in my view) characterizes the current use of Title I funds as a “hodgepodge.”

Title I has never been a specific program with agreed-upon practices or standards. Rather, it is a stream of money bestowed on nearly all of the nation’s school districts and many private schools. School administrators can mount any type of initiative they feel will be beneficial to the academic progress of poor children.

Thus, schools are using the roughly $14 billion in annual Title I funding to support many undertakings: staffing and teacher training; whole-school programs; pullout programs; after-school sessions; reading, math, and science instruction; and myriad other endeavors. Much of the money is spent on elementary school students, but some of it goes to preschool (about $300 million) and to secondary education. With such a laundry list of activities, one would be hard-pressed to explain to taxpayers exactly what they are purchasing.

It would be good to change this. I’m not sure that the models Professor Zigler recommends are the best choices (there are a few models for whole-school reform that have strong records), but focusing the funding on evidence-based methods—not the usual hodgepodge—would be valuable.

Link to Professor Zigler’s editorial.

Sphere: Related Content




Bad Behavior has blocked 1089 access attempts in the last 7 days.

*/goog +1 script added 20110711 */